A role determining at the behest of a social group
Leader is a term we often listen and mention with recurrence in our language and if we belong to a group, at work, in school, friends, without a doubt, we will recognize it, we lived or live with it and because we ourselves, if we bring together the qualities of the case not also exercise such a role social, so decisive and important at the behest of a group.
Features, special conditions that a person must meet to erect in leader
Because the leader is someone who serves as a guide or leader of a group, but eye, not all are able to be leaders, there are features, special conditions that a person must meet to erect leader.
The charism
To begin, it is important to peers or the rest of the members of the group to recognize special abilities which are not found elsewhere and then naturally become leader in it. Among them we can mention the charism and the angel, as popularly, say that they will make that person causes a good impression of the scene both in the Group and off. Charisma is important because it is proven that allows you to get things, but not anything but those that need group.
Can influence peers
Another virtue that can recognize a leader how indispensable is the ability to influence their peers in other subjects, both his conduct and his words, manage Jig so deep in the rest of the individuals getting to encourage them to also work towards a goal in common. Normally this profile called it is motivating because it is able to motivate through his sayings, rants, fellow, out victorious in a proposed objective. In sport, to put it more clearly with an example, the presence of a motivating leader within the group, that can be embodied by the coach and also by a player who has good communication with all of your partners is vital.
Identification with the group. Excel. Know manage and organize. Develop strategies
Other conditions that must be observed by a leader and that add to the already stated are: belonging to the group headed by sharing cultural patterns and meanings that the Party proposes, i.e. fully identify with the group in which it participates and prove it with facts; Excel in interesting thing, be the brighter in certain area, the best when it comes to organizing, the more diplomatic, more aggressive, Holy, or, as appropriate, monitor, direct, motivate and organize the Group and capacity to formulate strategies. Not only often enough with the consensus and acceptance to succeed at something, may also need to be a good plan to specify what you want to and then the leader must know to design it, implement it and give each Member a role to add in the achievement.
The leader in sports
In the field of sport, more precisely in those disciplines of groups such as soccer, basketball, among others, usually occurs frequently the appearance of a leader, usually this role will be embodied in that most experience and recognition for achievements, player who somehow assumes the voice and where necessary vote, to fight for the rights and needs of the Group and to infect fellow strength and desire in order to to achieve the proposed objective, which can be the obtaining of the Championship in which they participate.
Common types of leaders
Depending on the manner through which directs the group, we can find different types of leaders. The authoritarian leader, will be the one that makes decisions without consulting the group that directs them, other say that this leader will not be agreed and accepted by the group leader calling but its leadership is supported by the provision of power, tapping him to rest the option to comply with; the Democratic leader, discusses the alternatives with the Group and decide by consensus, without a doubt, is the most positive option for the Group and the type that best fits the definition of leader; and the Laissez Faire or also called Liberal leader, characterized by deploying passive behaviour, by delegating power to others. But this is not the only classification, there is another way of classifying them, that is according to the influence they exert on their subordinates. Here you will find with the charismatic leader, who is the one who will come to change the values, beliefs and attitudes of his followers or the transactional leader, who on the contrary is limited to provide the resources that considers valid for the group. On the other hand, the methodology of choice of this guide, or leader, will also determine different types of leaders. The formal, which are those selected by an organization and the informal, that emerge naturally and spontaneously from the group itself.